Ten holdings feels diversified. Whether it is depends entirely on whether those ten fall for the same reasons. Assets that move together are called correlated, and a portfolio of correlated things is one bet wearing several costumes.
Two technology companies can be genuinely different businesses with different customers and different products — and when a scare hits their industry, both fall anyway. Sector, geography, size and business model all create these links. The companies do not need anything in common except exposure to whatever just happened.
This is the practical consequence and it surprises people who count tickers. If everything you own responds to the same shock in the same direction, owning more of them barely reduces the swing. The diversification benefit comes from difference, not from quantity — and the count on your screen measures the wrong thing.
Now consider a pair that often behaves differently: stocks and government bonds. A bond is a loan you make in exchange for steady interest. In many storms, when stocks fall, bonds hold steady or rise, because frightened money moves toward predictable income. That is a genuinely different response to the same event — which is what diversification is made of.
The important caveat: these relationships shift, and they have an unhelpful habit of tightening in a crisis. In a severe enough panic, things that normally move independently can fall together as people sell whatever they can. Diversification reduces ordinary risk reliably and extreme risk only partially, and expecting more from it than that is how people are surprised twice.